Lithosphere (Jul 2024)

Apatite Fission-Track Dating: A Comparative Study of Ages Obtained by the Automated Counting LA-ICP-MS and External Detector Methodologies

  • Raúl E. Lugo-Zazueta,
  • Andrew J. W. Gleadow,
  • Barry P. Kohn,
  • Himansu Sahu,
  • Mauricio A. Bermúdez

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2113/2023/lithosphere_2023_260
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2023, no. Special 14

Abstract

Read online

Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) in combination with developments in digital microscopy, image analysis, and computer software has allowed the implementation of an automated counting approach for the apatite fission-track (AFT) analysis. We refer to this approach as the “automated counting-LA-ICP-MS” (ACLA) method. Two major components comprise the ACLA method: (i) the digital counting of spontaneous tracks performed on high-resolution images captured from apatite grains and (ii) the measurement of 238U content in apatite by LA-ICP-MS. This study includes ACLA analyses from Fish Canyon Tuff (FCT) and Durango apatite standard crystals. Furthermore, a comparative age study between the ACLA and conventional external detector method (EDM) strategies was performed on a set of thirteen granitoid samples from northwestern Mexico and four granitic samples from the eastern Dharwar craton (EDC), India. ACLA analyses on FCT yielded an AFT age of 28.1 ± 0.6 (1σ) and 28.8 ± 1.1 (1σ) Ma for Durango apatite, whereas reported EDM ages are 27.5 ± 0.5 and 31.4 ± 0.5 Ma, respectively. Calculated AFT ages using the ACLA method from northwestern Mexico samples range from 11.1 ± 1.1 to 42.0 ± 3.6 Ma (EDM ages range from 10.0 ± 0.8 to 54.0 ± 3.0 Ma), whereas AFT ages from the EDC samples range from 147 ± 3.1 to 220.5 ± 12.5 Ma (EDM ages range from 120.9 ± 4.5 to 197.1 ± 19.4 Ma). Based on a statistical comparison with ages previously determined by the conventional EDM on the same samples and considering their 2σ uncertainties, these ages are in good agreement.