Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Apr 2022)

Insights on Distinct Left Atrial Remodeling Between Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

  • Jen-Yuan Kuo,
  • Jen-Yuan Kuo,
  • Jen-Yuan Kuo,
  • Xuanyi Jin,
  • Xuanyi Jin,
  • Jing-Yi Sun,
  • Sheng-Hsiung Chang,
  • Sheng-Hsiung Chang,
  • Po-Ching Chi,
  • Kuo-Tzu Sung,
  • Kuo-Tzu Sung,
  • Kuo-Tzu Sung,
  • Greta S. P. Mok,
  • Chun-Ho Yun,
  • Chun-Ho Yun,
  • Chun-Ho Yun,
  • Shun-Chuan Chang,
  • Fa-Po Chung,
  • Fa-Po Chung,
  • Ching-Hsiang Yu,
  • Tung-Hsin Wu,
  • Chung-Lieh Hung,
  • Chung-Lieh Hung,
  • Chung-Lieh Hung,
  • Hung-I Yeh,
  • Hung-I Yeh,
  • Hung-I Yeh,
  • Carolyn S. P. Lam,
  • Carolyn S. P. Lam

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.857360
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundHeart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexist with overlapping pathophysiology like left atrial (LA) remodeling, which might differ given different underlying mechanisms.ObjectivesWe sought to investigate the different patterns of LA wall remodeling in AF vs. HFpEF.MethodsWe compared LA wall characteristics including wall volume (LAWV), wall thickness (LAWT), and wall thickness heterogeneity (LAWT[SD]) and LA structure, function among the controls (without AF or HFpEF, n = 115), HFpEF alone (n = 59), AF alone (n = 37), and HFpEF+AF (n = 38) groups using multi-detector computed tomography and echocardiography.ResultsLA wall remodeling was most predominant and peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) was worst in HFpEF+AF patients as compared to the rest. Despite lower E/e' (9.8 ± 3.8 vs. 13.4 ± 6.4) yet comparable LA volume, LAWT and PALS in AF alone vs. HFpEF alone, LAWV [12.6 (11.6–15.3) vs. 12.0 (10.2–13.7); p = 0.01] and LAWT(SD) [0.68 (0.61–0.71) vs. 0.60 (0.56–0.65); p < 0.001] were significantly greater in AF alone vs. HFpEF alone even after multi-variate adjustment and propensity matching. After excluding the HFpEF+AF group, both LAWV and LAWT [SD] provided incremental values when added to PALS or LAVi (all p for net reclassification improvement <0.05) in discriminating AF alone, with LAWT[SD] yielding the largest C-statistic (0.78, 95% CI: 0.70–0.86) among all LA wall indices.ConclusionsDespite a similar extent of LA enlargement and dysfunction in HFpEF vs. AF alone, larger LAWV and LAWT [SD] can distinguish AF from HFpEF alone, suggesting the distinct underlying pathophysiological mechanism of LA remodeling in AF vs. HFpEF.

Keywords