International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (Dec 2021)

The Physical Activity Messaging Framework (PAMF) and Checklist (PAMC): International consensus statement and user guide

  • Chloë Williamson,
  • Graham Baker,
  • Jennifer R. Tomasone,
  • Adrian Bauman,
  • Nanette Mutrie,
  • Ailsa Niven,
  • Justin Richards,
  • Adewale Oyeyemi,
  • Beelin Baxter,
  • Benjamin Rigby,
  • Benny Cullen,
  • Brendan Paddy,
  • Brett Smith,
  • Charlie Foster,
  • Clare Drummy,
  • Corneel Vandelanotte,
  • Emily Oliver,
  • Fatwa Sari Tetra Dewi,
  • Fran McEwen,
  • Frances Bain,
  • Guy Faulkner,
  • Hamish McEwen,
  • Hayley Mills,
  • Jack Brazier,
  • James Nobles,
  • Jennifer Hall,
  • Kaleigh Maclaren,
  • Karen Milton,
  • Kate Olscamp,
  • Lisseth Villalobos Campos,
  • Louise Bursle,
  • Marie Murphy,
  • Nick Cavill,
  • Nora J. Johnston,
  • Paul McCrorie,
  • Rakhmat Ari Wibowo,
  • Rebecca Bassett-Gunter,
  • Rebecca Jones,
  • Sarah Ruane,
  • Trevor Shilton,
  • Paul Kelly

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01230-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Effective physical activity messaging plays an important role in the pathway towards changing physical activity behaviour at a population level. The Physical Activity Messaging Framework (PAMF) and Checklist (PAMC) are outputs from a recent modified Delphi study. This sought consensus from an international expert panel on how to aid the creation and evaluation of physical activity messages. In this paper, we (1) present an overview of the various concepts within the PAMF and PAMC, (2) discuss in detail how the PAMF and PAMC can be used to create physical activity messages, plan evaluation of messages, and aid understanding and categorisation of existing messages, and (3) highlight areas for future development and research. If adopted, we propose that the PAMF and PAMC could improve physical activity messaging practice by encouraging evidence-based and target population-focused messages with clearly stated aims and consideration of potential working pathways. They could also enhance the physical activity messaging research base by harmonising key messaging terminologies, improving quality of reporting, and aiding collation and synthesis of the evidence.

Keywords