Frontiers in Medicine (Jun 2024)

Design and pilot test of an implicit bias mitigation curriculum for clinicians

  • Laura P. Svetkey,
  • Gary G. Bennett,
  • Benjamin Reese,
  • Leonor Corsino,
  • Sandro O. Pinheiro,
  • Jonathan E. Fischer,
  • Judy Seidenstein,
  • Maren K. Olsen,
  • Maren K. Olsen,
  • Tyson Brown,
  • Natalie Ezem,
  • Natalie Ezem,
  • Evan Liu,
  • Evan Liu,
  • Alesha Majors,
  • Karen E. Steinhauser,
  • Karen E. Steinhauser,
  • Brandy H. Sullivan,
  • Michelle van Ryn,
  • Sarah M. Wilson,
  • Hongqiu Yang,
  • Kimberly S. Johnson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1316475
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionClinician implicit racial bias (IB) may lead to lower quality care and adverse health outcomes for Black patients. Educational efforts to train clinicians to mitigate IB vary widely and have insufficient evidence of impact. We developed and pilot-tested an evidence-based clinician IB curriculum, “REACHing Equity.”MethodsTo assess acceptability and feasibility, we conducted an uncontrolled one-arm pilot trial with post-intervention assessments. REACHing Equity is designed for clinicians to: (1) acquire knowledge about IB and its impact on healthcare, (2) increase awareness of one's own capacity for IB, and (3) develop skills to mitigate IB in the clinical encounter. We delivered REACHing Equity virtually in three facilitated, interactive sessions over 7–9 weeks. Participants were health care providers who completed baseline and end-of-study evaluation surveys.ResultsOf approximately 1,592 clinicians invited, 37 participated, of whom 29 self-identified as women and 24 as non-Hispanic White. Attendance averaged 90% per session; 78% attended all 3 sessions. Response rate for evaluation surveys was 67%. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the curriculum objectives were met, and that REACHing Equity equipped them to mitigate the impact of implicit bias in clinical care. Participants consistently reported higher self-efficacy for mitigating IB after compared to before completing the curriculum.ConclusionsDespite apparent barriers to clinician participation, we demonstrated feasibility and acceptability of the REACHing Equity intervention. Further research is needed to develop objective measures of uptake and clinician skill, test the impact of REACHing Equity on clinically relevant outcomes, and refine the curriculum for uptake and dissemination.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03415308.

Keywords