PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

A review of reported network degree and recruitment characteristics in respondent driven sampling implications for applied researchers and methodologists.

  • Lisa Avery,
  • Alison Macpherson,
  • Sarah Flicker,
  • Michael Rotondi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249074
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 4
p. e0249074

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveRespondent driven sampling (RDS) is an important tool for measuring disease prevalence in populations with no sampling frame. We aim to describe key properties of these samples to guide those using this method and to inform methodological research.MethodsIn 2019, authors who published respondent driven sampling studies were contacted with a request to share reported degree and network information. Of 59 author groups identified, 15 (25%) agreed to share data, representing 53 distinct study samples containing 36,547 participants across 12 countries and several target populations including migrants, sex workers and men who have sex with men. Distribution of reported network degree was described for each sample and characteristics of recruitment chains, and their relationship to coupons, were reported.ResultsReported network degree is severely skewed and is best represented by a log normal distribution. For participants connected to more than 15 other people, reported degree is imprecise and frequently rounded to the nearest five or ten. Our results indicate that many samples contain highly connected individuals, who may be connected to at least 1000 other people.ConclusionBecause very large reported degrees are common; we caution against treating these reports as outliers. The imprecise and skewed distribution of the reported degree should be incorporated into future RDS methodological studies to better capture real-world performance. Previous results indicating poor performance of regression estimators using RDS weights may be widely generalizable. Fewer recruitment coupons may be associated with longer recruitment chains.