Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology (Mar 2021)

Professional continuous glucose monitoring and endocrinology eConsult for adults with type 2 diabetes in primary care: Results of a clinical pilot program

  • Kathryn L. Fantasia,
  • Mary-Catherine Stockman,
  • Zhihui Ju,
  • Paola Ortega,
  • Erika L. Crable,
  • Mari-Lynn Drainoni,
  • Allan J. Walkey,
  • Megan Bergstrom,
  • Katelyn O'Brien,
  • Devin Steenkamp

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24
p. 100254

Abstract

Read online

Background: Limitations in access to specialty diabetes care exist. Endocrinology eConsult that integrates professional continuous glucose monitoring (CGM-enhanced eConsult) may improve healthcare delivery, but has yet to be evaluated. We implemented a pilot program for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) managed by primary care clinical pharmacists using CGM-enhanced eConsult and evaluated the acceptability and clinical outcomes in comparison to routine in-person endocrinology consultation. Methods: Seventy-four adult patients with established T2DM (age 18–65) were included. Twenty-nine were seen in-person by endocrinology and 45 were seen by pharmacists in primary care. Thirteen patients were referred for CGM-enhanced eConsult. Acceptability was assessed with pre/post clinician acceptability questionnaires and patient assessment of perceived burden. Clinical outcomes included time to first specialty appointment, baseline and 3-month follow-up HbA1c, and antihyperglycemic medication use. Results: There were no differences in patient acceptability of the CGM-enhanced eConsult as compared to endocrinology referral or pharmacy care. At baseline, all patients referred for eConsult were prescribed insulin. Three-month glycemic outcomes were comparable, with HbA1c reduction 1% + 2% in endocrinology, 1.5% + 1.1% with CGM-enhanced eConsult, and 1.6% + 1.8% in clinical pharmacy (p = 0.19). Time to an initial diabetes visit with a pharmacist was significantly shorter than with endocrinology, 20 days (IQR 26) for pharmacy vs. 45 days (IQR 54) for endocrinology, (p = 0.0001). Conclusions: CGM-enhanced eConsult resulted in more timely access to endocrinology expertise, was acceptable to patients, and resulted in similar short-term glycemic outcomes compared to in-person consultation. Effectiveness of CGM-enhanced eConsults should be further explored.

Keywords