The impact of reactive case detection on malaria transmission in Zanzibar in the presence of human mobility
Aatreyee M. Das,
Manuel W. Hetzel,
Joshua O. Yukich,
Logan Stuck,
Bakar S. Fakih,
Abdul-wahid H. Al-mafazy,
Abdullah Ali,
Nakul Chitnis
Affiliations
Aatreyee M. Das
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Corresponding author at: Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Manuel W. Hetzel
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Joshua O. Yukich
Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
Logan Stuck
Center for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
Bakar S. Fakih
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
Abdul-wahid H. Al-mafazy
Zanzibar Malaria Elimination Programme, Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania
Abdullah Ali
Zanzibar Malaria Elimination Programme, Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania
Nakul Chitnis
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Malaria persists at low levels on Zanzibar despite the use of vector control and case management. We use a metapopulation model to investigate the role of human mobility in malaria persistence on Zanzibar, and the impact of reactive case detection. The model was parameterized using survey data on malaria prevalence, reactive case detection, and travel history. We find that in the absence of imported cases from mainland Tanzania, malaria would likely cease to persist on Zanzibar. We also investigate potential intervention scenarios that may lead to elimination, especially through changes to reactive case detection. While we find that some additional cases are removed by reactive case detection, a large proportion of cases are missed due to many infections having a low parasite density that go undetected by rapid diagnostic tests, a low rate of those infected with malaria seeking treatment, and a low rate of follow up at the household level of malaria cases detected at health facilities. While improvements in reactive case detection would lead to a reduction in malaria prevalence, none of the intervention scenarios tested here were sufficient to reach elimination. Imported cases need to be treated to have a substantial impact on prevalence.