Asian Journal of Surgery (Mar 2024)

Bridging techniques compared with direct endovascular therapy for stroke due to tandem occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Yihang Sui,
  • Yu Shi,
  • Yanmei Yang,
  • Jin Xiao,
  • Yanru Zhou,
  • Siyuan Zhang,
  • Yue Qiu,
  • Yang Xie,
  • Zhiyu Lv

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 47, no. 3
pp. 1339 – 1343

Abstract

Read online

The superiority of the bridging strategy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus endovascular therapy (EVT) to EVT alone for the anterior circulation with tandem vascular occlusion (TO) has not been specifically addressed by a single randomized trial. Analysis of 15 studies (n = 1857 patients) revealed that 90 Day good functional outcomes (MRS≤2) were better for bridging therapy (IVT + EVT) than for dEVT (OR:1.39, 95%CI: 1.09–1.79, p = 0.008); 90-day mortality was lower for IVT + EVT than for dEVT (OR: 0.57; 95%CI: 0.40–0.81, p = 0.002) and rates of successful recanalization were higher for IVT + EVT than for dEVT (OR: 1.79, 95%CI: 1.36–2.36, p<0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of symptomatic. intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) between groups (OR 0.91, 95%CI 0.64–1.31, p = 0.62).In conclusion, Patients receiving IVT + EVT have a better functional outcome, lower death rate and a higher rate of successful recanalization than those receiving dEVT but there was no difference in sICH risk between the two treatments.

Keywords