Scientific Reports (Feb 2021)

Hospital-level variation in follow-up strategies after percutaneous coronary intervention, revealed in health claims data of Korea

  • Jae-Hyung Roh,
  • Jihyun Sohn,
  • Jae-Hwan Lee,
  • In-Sun Kwon,
  • Hanbyul Lee,
  • Yong-Hoon Yoon,
  • Minsu Kim,
  • Yong-Giun Kim,
  • Gyung-Min Park,
  • Jong-Young Lee,
  • Jae-Hyeong Park,
  • Dong Heon Yang,
  • Hun Sik Park

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82960-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract This study sought to determine hospital variation in the use of follow-up stress testing (FUST) and invasive coronary angiography (FUCAG) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The claims records of 150,580 Korean patients who received PCI in 128 hospitals between 2008 and 2015 were analyzed. Patient were considered to have undergone FUST and FUCAG, when these testings were performed within two years after discharge from the index hospitalization. Hierarchical generalized linear and frailty models were used to evaluate binary and time-to-event outcomes. Hospital-level risk-standardized FUCAG and FUST rates were highly variable across the hospitals (median, 0.41; interquartile range [IQR], 0.27–0.59; median, 0.22; IQR, 0.08–0.39, respectively). The performances of various models predicting the likelihood of FUCAG and FUST were compared, and the best performance was observed with the models adjusted for patient case mix and individual hospital effects as random effects (receiver operating characteristic curves, 0.72 for FUCAG; 0.82 for FUST). The intraclass correlation coefficients of the models (0.41 and 0.68, respectively) indicated that a considerable proportion of the observed variation was related to individual institutional effects. Higher hospital-level FUCAG and FUST rates were not preventive of death or myocardial infarction. Increased repeat revascularizations were observed in hospitals with higher FUCAG rates.