BMC Infectious Diseases (May 2021)

Salivary testing of COVID-19: evaluation of serological testing following positive salivary results

  • Lisa Caulley,
  • Julie Shaw,
  • Martin Corsten,
  • Nadia Hua,
  • Jonathan B. Angel,
  • Guillaume Poliquin,
  • Jonathan Whelan,
  • Kym Antonation,
  • Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06108-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 4

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Salivary detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been proposed as an alternative to nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab testing. Our group previously published a study demonstrating that both testing methods identified SARS-CoV-2 using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based detection methodology. We therefore conducted a follow-up study using antibody testing to evaluate the accuracy of saliva versus swabs for COVID-19 detection and the durability of antibody response. Methods Venous blood samples were collected from consenting participants and the presence of serum antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated on a large, automated immunoassay platform by the Roche anti-SARS-CoV-2 qualitative assay (Roche Diagnostics, Laval Quebec). Individuals with a serum antibody cut-off index (COI) ≥ 1.0 were considered positive. Results In asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients with a previously positive standard swab and/or saliva SARS-CoV-2 PCR-test, 42 demonstrated antibodies with 13 patients positive by swab alone, and 8 patients positive by saliva alone. Conclusions Despite their status as ‘current standard’ for COVID-19 testing, these findings highlight limitations of PCR-based tests.

Keywords