PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

Geographical variation and factors associated with unsafe child stool disposal in Ethiopia: A spatial and multilevel analysis.

  • Biniyam Sahiledengle,
  • Zinash Teferu,
  • Yohannes Tekalegn,
  • Tadesse Awoke,
  • Demisu Zenbaba,
  • Kebebe Bekele,
  • Abdi Tesemma,
  • Fikadu Seyoum,
  • Demelash Woldeyohannes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250814
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 4
p. e0250814

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundUnsafe disposal of children's stool makes children susceptible to fecal-oral diseases and children remain vulnerable till the stools of all children are disposed of safely. There is a paucity of data on spatial distribution and factors associated with unsafe child stool disposal in Ethiopia. Previous estimates, however, do not include information regarding individual and community-level factors associated with unsafe child stool disposal. Hence, the current study aimed (i) to explore the spatial distribution and (ii) to identify factors associated with unsafe child stool disposal in Ethiopia.MethodsA secondary data analysis was conducted using the recent 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey data. A total of 4145 children aged 0-23 months with their mother were included in this analysis. The Getis-Ord spatial statistical tool was used to identify high and low hotspots areas of unsafe child stool disposal. The Bernoulli model was applied using Kilduff SaTScan version 9.6 software to identify significant spatial clusters. A multilevel multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to identify factors associated with unsafe child stool disposal.ResultsUnsafe child stool disposal was spatially clustered in Ethiopia (Moran's Index = 0.211, p-valueConclusionsUnsafe child stool disposal was spatially clustered. Higher odds of unsafe child stool disposal were found in households with high community poverty level, poor, unimproved toilet facility, and with the youngest children. Hence, the health authorities could tailor effective child stool management programs to mitigate the inequalities identified in this study. It is also better to consider child stool management intervention in existing sanitation activities considering the identified factors.