In Autumn 2020, DOAJ will be relaunching with a new website with updated functionality, improved search, and a simplified application form. More information is available on our blog. Our API is also changing.

Hide this message

Risposta a “Riflessioni sulla narrazione storica nelle voci di Wikipedia”

Diacronie. Studi di Storia Contemporanea. 2017;9(1):1-4


Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Diacronie. Studi di Storia Contemporanea

ISSN: 2038-0925 (Online)

Publisher: Diacronie

Society/Institution: Associazione culturale Diacronie

LCC Subject Category: History (General) and history of Europe: History (General): Modern history, 1453-

Country of publisher: Italy

Language of fulltext: Spanish, English, Italian, French

Full-text formats available: PDF



Iolanda Pensa (è ricercatore alla SUPSI Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana. È un contributore di Wikipedia dal 2006, socio di Wikimedia Italia e Wikimedia CH, attiva nell’organizzazione del concorso Wiki Loves Monuments, e responsabile generale di “Wikimania Esino Lario” il raduno mondiale di Wikipedia sulle Alpi a giugno 2016.)


Double blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 28 weeks


Abstract | Full Text

What kind of relationship do the historical sciences have with Wikipedia? How should a reader approach Wikipedia articles dealing with history? What role will the upcoming “free encyclopedia” play in the study and teaching of history? Starting from an analysis on some Wikipedia’s article performed by the “Nicoletta Bourbaki” working group, six authors animate a panel discussion on the relationship between the free encyclopedia and history.