Frontiers in Psychiatry (Nov 2024)

Mixed-methods formative evaluation of implementing an adapted suicide prevention treatment: Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills Groups in the Veterans Health Administration

  • Suzanne E. Decker,
  • Suzanne E. Decker,
  • Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers,
  • Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers,
  • Kristin Mattocks,
  • Kristin Mattocks,
  • Frances M. Aunon,
  • Frances M. Aunon,
  • Elizabeth Galliford,
  • Neal Doran,
  • Neal Doran,
  • Scarlett Baird,
  • Scarlett Baird,
  • Jennifer K. Rielage,
  • Jennifer K. Rielage,
  • Josephine Ridley,
  • Josephine Ridley,
  • Jenny Bannister,
  • Thorayya S. Giovannelli,
  • Sara J. Landes,
  • Sara J. Landes,
  • Marianne Goodman,
  • Marianne Goodman,
  • Lorrie Walker,
  • Eric DeRycke,
  • Chris Shriver,
  • Ethan Spana,
  • Mark Honsberger,
  • Hannah Brown,
  • Stacey Demirelli,
  • Elena Shest,
  • Steve Martino,
  • Steve Martino

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1495102
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundPreventing veteran suicide requires addressing mechanisms driving suicidal behavior, such as emotion dysregulation. Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills Groups (DBT-SG) are well established for reducing emotion dysregulation, improving coping skills, and in some studies, reducing suicide attempt, but will require implementation support to deliver DBT-SG and to test its effectiveness within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).MethodsWe conducted a mixed-method developmental formative evaluation of DBT-SG at four VHA medical centers, guided by the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework, as part of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (Clinical trials ID, NCT05000749).ResultsQuantitative Organizational Reasons for Change Assessment data (n = 30 VHA staff) and qualitative data (n = 35 VHA staff) were merged, compared, and triangulated. Quantitative and qualitative data largely converged, showing favorable views of evidence supporting DBT-SG and strong enthusiasm for its potential to reduce veteran suicide attempt. Staff noted DBT-SG’s broad applicability to veterans. Staff were less optimistic about the inner context supporting DBT-SG implementation, commenting on how limited staffing could be a barrier despite leadership wanting to support suicide prevention.ConclusionsImplementation barriers to DBT-SG at VHA include limited staffing, despite staff enthusiasm. The next phase of this project will evaluate DBT-SG effectiveness in a randomized controlled trial.Clinical trials registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05000749, identifier NCT05000749.

Keywords