Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis (Sep 2021)

Retrospective Comparison of Andexanet Alfa and 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex for Reversal of Factor Xa-Inhibitor Related Bleeding

  • Victoria M. Stevens PharmD, BCCCP,
  • Toby C. Trujillo PharmD, FCCP, FAHA, BCPS,
  • Tyree H. Kiser PharmD, FCCM, FCCP, BCPS,
  • Robert MacLaren PharmD, MPH, FCCM, FCCP,
  • Paul M. Reynolds PharmD, BCCCP,
  • Scott W. Mueller PharmD, BCCCP, FCCM, FCCP

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296211039020
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 27

Abstract

Read online

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare andexanet alfa and 4-factor prothrombin complex (4F-PCC) for reversal of factor Xa (FXa)-inhibitor bleeding. Patients that received andexanet alfa for reversal were included. An equivalent number of patients administered 4F-PCC for FXa-inhibitor bleeding were randomly selected as historical controls. The primary outcome was effective hemostasis achievement within 12 h, defined using ANNEXA-4 criteria. Thromboembolic events and mortality within 30 days were also evaluated. A total of 32 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were not statistically different between andexanet alfa (n = 16) and 4F-PCC (n = 16). Intracranial bleeding was the primary reversal indication in 43.8% versus 62.5% of patients, respectively. Effective hemostasis was reached in 75.0% of andexanet alfa patients compared to 62.5% of 4F-PCC patients ( P = .70). Thromboembolic events occurred in 4 (25.0%) patients and 3 (18.8%) patients, respectively ( P = .99). Mortality incidence was 12.5% and 31.3%, respectively ( P = .39). Andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC attained hemostasis in a majority of patients. A high, but a similar rate of thromboembolic events was seen with both treatments. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate comparative risks and benefits of the 2 agents.