Mechanical Response Mechanism and Yield Characteristics of Coal Under Quasi-Static and Dynamic Loading

Abstract

During deep mining engineering, coal bodies are subjected to complex geological stresses such as periodic roof pressure and blasting impacts, which may induce mechanical property deterioration and trigger severe rock burst accidents. This study systematically investigated the mechanical characteristics and failure mechanisms of coal under strain rates on two orders of magnitude through quasi-static cyclic loading–unloading experiments and split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests, combined with acoustic emission (AE) localization and crack characteristic stress analysis. The research focused on the differential mechanical responses of coal-rock masses under distinct stress environments in deep mining. The results demonstrated that under quasi-static loading, the stress–strain curve exhibited four characteristic stages: compaction (I), linear elasticity (II), nonlinear crack propagation (III), and post-peak softening (IV). The peak strain displayed linear growth with increasing cycle, accompanied by a failure mode characterized by oblique shear failure that induced a transition from gradual to abrupt increases in the AE counts. In contrast, under the dynamic loading conditions, there was a bifurcated post-peak phase consisting of two unloading stages due to elastic rebound effects, with nonlinear growth of the peak strain and an interlaced failure pattern combining lateral tensile cracks and axial compressive fractures. The two loading conditions exhibited similar evolutionary trends in crack damage stress, though a slight reduction in stress occurred during the final dynamic loading phase due to accumulated damage. Notably, the crack closure stress under quasi-static loading followed a decrease–increase pattern with cycle progression, whereas the dynamic loading conditions presented the inverse increase–decrease tendency. These findings provide theoretical foundations for stability control in underground engineering and prevention of dynamic hazards.

Keywords

• crack characteristic stress
• failure mode
• comparative study
• quasi-static
• dynamic loading