Influence of PhoPQ and PmrAB two component system alternations on colistin resistance from non-mcr colistin resistant clinical E. Coli strains

Abstract

Abstract Background The current understanding of acquired chromosomal colistin resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales primarily involves the disruption of the upstream PmrAB and PhoPQ two-component system (TCS) control caused by mutations in the regulatory genes. Interestingly, previous studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the interaction of regulatory genes related to colistin resistance in Escherichia coli, specifically those surrounding PhoPQ and PmrAB TCS. Results In our study, we focused on two clinical non-mcr colistin-resistant strains of E. coli, TSAREC02 and TSAREC03, to gain a better understanding of their resistance mechanisms. Upon analysis, we discovered that TSAREC02 had a deletion (Δ27–45) in MgrB, as well as substitutions (G206R, Y222H) in PmrB. On the other hand, TSAREC03 exhibited a long deletion (Δ84–224) in PhoP, along with substitutions (M1I, L14P, P178S, T235N) in PmrB. We employed recombinant DNA techniques to explore the interaction between the PhoPQ and PmrAB two-component systems (TCSs) and examine the impact of the mutated phoPQ and pmrB genes on the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of colistin. We observed significant changes in the expression of the pmrD gene, which encodes a connector protein regulated by the PhoPQ TCS, in the TSAREC02 wild-type (WT)-mgrB replacement mutant and the TSAREC03 WT-phoP replacement mutant, compared to their respective parental strains. However, the expressions of pmrB/pmrA, which reflect PmrAB TCS activity, and the colistin MICs remained unchanged. In contrast, the colistin MICs and pmrB/pmrA expression levels were significantly reduced in the pmrB deletion mutants from both TSAREC02 and TSAREC03, compared to their parental strains. Moreover, we were able to restore colistin resistance and the expressions of pmrB/pmrA by transforming a plasmid containing the parental mutated pmrB back into the TSAREC02 and TSAREC03 mutants, respectively. Conclusion While additional data from clinical E. coli isolates are necessary to validate whether our findings could be broadly applied to the E. coli population, our study illuminates distinct regulatory pathway interactions involving colistin resistance in E. coli compared to other species of Enterobacterales. The added information provided by our study contribute to a deeper understanding of the complex pathway interactions within Enterobacterales.

Keywords

• Colistin
• Resistance
• E. Coli
• Chromosome
• PhoP
• MgrB