Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease (Jul 2023)

Imaging Predictors of Left Ventricular Functional Recovery after Reperfusion Therapy of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

  • Agneta Virbickiene,
  • Tomas Lapinskas,
  • Christoph D. Garlichs,
  • Stephan Mattecka,
  • Radu Tanacli,
  • Wolfgang Ries,
  • Jan Torzewski,
  • Franz Heigl,
  • Christian Pfluecke,
  • Harald Darius,
  • Hueseyin Ince,
  • Peter Nordbeck,
  • Christian Butter,
  • Andreas Schuster,
  • Steffen Mitzner,
  • Olivija Dobiliene,
  • Ahmed Sheriff,
  • Sebastian Kelle

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10070294
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 7
p. 294

Abstract

Read online

Background: Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) is a superior predictor of adverse cardiac events in patients with myocardial infarction and heart failure. We investigated the ability of morphological features of infarcted myocardium to detect acute left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and predict LV functional recovery after three months in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: Sixty-six STEMI patients were included in the C-reactive protein (CRP) apheresis in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study (CAMI-1). LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV GLS, LV global circumferential strain (LV GCS), infarct size (IS), area-at-risk (AAR), and myocardial salvage index (MSI) were assessed by CMR 5 ± 3 days (baseline) and 12 ± 2 weeks after (follow-up) the diagnosis of first acute STEMI. Results: Significant changes in myocardial injury parameters were identified after 12 weeks of STEMI diagnosis. IS decreased from 23.59 ± 11.69% at baseline to 18.29 ± 8.32% at follow-up (p r = −0.479, p r = 0.441, p r = 0.396, p = 0.001) as well as between AAR and LVEF (r = −0.430, p = 0.003), LV GLS (r = 0.501, p r = 0.342, p = 0.020). At follow-up, only MSI and change in LV GCS over time showed a weak but significant correlation (r = −0.347, p = 0.021). Patients with larger AAR at baseline improved more in LVEF (p = 0.019) and LV GLS (p = 0.020) but not in LV GCS. Conclusion: The CMR tissue characteristics of myocardial injury correlate with the magnitude of LV dysfunction during the acute stage of STEMI. AAR predicts improvement in LVEF and LV GLS, while MSI is a sensitive marker of LV GCS recovery at three months follow-up after STEMI.

Keywords