Zhongguo cuzhong zazhi (Feb 2024)
脑心健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标体系的构建研究 Construction of Core Competency Evaluation Index System for Brain and Heart Health Managers
Abstract
目的 构建脑心健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标体系，以期为脑心健康管理师的培养和评价提供参考依据。 方法 通过文献回顾和研究小组讨论形成脑心健康管理师核心胜任力各级指标初始条目池，于2022年7—12月采用德尔菲法对我国13个省级行政区的21位专家进行两轮函询后确定最终的评价指标体系，并应用层次分析法确定各指标权重。 结果 两轮专家函询的有效参与人数和函询表回收率分别为22位（100%）和21位（95.45%）。 第1轮函询专家的权威系数为0.883，第2轮函询专家的权威系数为0.880。第1轮专家函询的肯德尔和谐系数为0.307，第2轮专家函询的肯德尔和谐系数为0.243，两轮函询专家对各指标的意见趋于一致。最终构建的脑心健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标体系包括5个一级指标（知识综合能力、专业实践能力、人际交往能力、专业发展能力和职业人文特质）、17个二级指标和51个三级指标。 结论 本研究构建的脑心健康管理师核心胜任力评价指标体系具有一定科学性和可靠性，有望为进一步分析脑心健康管理师核心胜任力现状提供参考依据。 Abstract: Objective The core competency evaluation index system for brain and heart health managers was established to provide reference for the training and evaluation of brain and heart health managers. Methods Literature review and panel discussion were used to establish the preliminary index of the core competency for brain and heart health managers. From July to December 2022, the Delphi method was adopted to determine the final evaluation index system after two rounds of correspondence with 21 experts from 13 provincial administrative regions in China, and the weight of each index was determined by analytic hierarchy process. Results The number of participants and effective recovery rate of the two rounds of expert consultation were 22 (100%) and 21 (95.45%), respectively. The expert authority coefficient of the first round of consultation was 0.883, and that of the second round of consultation was 0.880. The Kendall’s concordance coefficient of the first round of consultation was 0.307, and that of the second round of consultation was 0.243. The experts in the two rounds of correspondence tended to agree on the indicators. Finally, the core competency evaluation index system for brain and heart health managers was formed, including 5 first-level indicators (knowledge comprehensive ability, professional practice ability, interpersonal communication ability, professional development ability, professional humanistic traits), 17 second-level indicators and 51 third-level indicators. Conclusions The core competency evaluation index system for brain and heart health managers established in this study is scientific and reliable, which can provide a reference for further analysis of the current situation of core competency of brain and heart health managers.
Keywords
