Resuscitation Plus (Dec 2023)
To withhold resuscitation – The Swedish system’s rules and challenges
Abstract
The aim of this article is to describe current Swedish legalisation, clinical practice and future perspectives on the medical ethical decision “Do-Not-Attempt-Cardio-Pulmonary-Resuscitation” (DNACPR) in relation to prevent futile resuscitation of in-hospital cardiac arrests. Sweden has about 2200 in-hospital cardiac arrests yearly, with an overall 30-day survival ratio of 35%. This population is highly selected, although the frequency of DNACPR orders for hospitalized patients is unknown, resuscitation is initiated in only 6–13% of patients dying in Swedish hospitals.According to Swedish law and although shared decision making is sought, the physician is the ultimate decision-maker and consultation with the patient, her relatives and another licenced health care practitioner is mandatory. According to studies, these consultations is documented in only about 10% of the decisions. Clinicians lack tools to assess risk of IHCA, tools to predict outcome and we are not good at guessing patients own will.Future directives for clinical practice need to address difficulties for physicians in making decisions as well as the timing of decisions.We conclude that the principles in Swedish law needs to be fulfilled by a more systematic approach to documentation and planning of meetings between patients, relatives and colleagues.
