Hepatology Communications (Feb 2021)

Reduced Clot Stability by Thromboelastography as a Potential Indicator of Procedure‐Related Bleeding in Decompensated Cirrhosis

  • Alberto Zanetto,
  • Henry M. Rinder,
  • Marco Senzolo,
  • Paolo Simioni,
  • Guadalupe Garcia‐Tsao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1641
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 2
pp. 272 – 282

Abstract

Read online

In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, procedure‐related bleeding is a potentially lethal complication. Routine coagulation tests such as international normalized ratio and platelet count do not predict bleeding risk. We investigated whether thromboelastography (TEG) can identify patients with cirrhosis who are at risk of procedure‐related bleeding. As a part of a prospective study on hemostasis in decompensated cirrhosis, patients had TEG performed on admission and were followed prospectively during hospitalization for the development of procedure‐related bleeding. Eighty patients with cirrhosis were included. Among the 72 who had procedures performed, 7 had procedure‐related bleeding, which was major in three cases (two following paracentesis and one following thoracentesis). Conventional coagulation tests were comparable between bleeding and nonbleeding patients, whereas TEG parameters of k‐time (4.5 minutes vs. 2.2 minutes; P = 0.02), α‐angle (34° vs. 59°; P = 0.003), and maximum amplitude (37 mm vs. 50 mm; P = 0.004) were significantly different (all indicative of hypocoagulability). TEG maximum amplitude (MA), a marker of overall clot stability, accurately discriminated between patients who had major, life‐threatening bleeding (all with MA 30 mm), whereas a platelet count < 50 × 109/L could not discriminate between bleeding (minor or major) and nonbleeding patients. Conclusion: In a prospective cohort of hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis, TEG parameters associated with hypocoagulability appeared to predict procedure‐related bleeding, particularly a TEG MA < 30 mm. If results are validated in a larger cohort, this could be a threshold to identify patients with decompensated cirrhosis at higher risk for procedure‐related bleeding, in whom to consider preprocedural prophylaxis.