Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics (Jul 2024)

Minimally Invasive Surgery For Management of Bunionette Deformity (Tailor’s Bunion) Using Fifth Metatarsal Osteotomies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Thomas L. Lewis MBChB(Hons), BSc(Hons), FRCS(Tr & Orth), MFSTEd,
  • Peter Lam MBBS(Hons), FRACS,
  • Yousif Alkhalfan MBBCh, BAO, MRCS,
  • Robbie Ray MBChB, ChM(T&O), FRCSed(Tr & Orth), FEBOT

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114241263095
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

Background: There has been increasing interest in the use of percutaneous or minimally invasive osteotomy techniques for bunionette correction. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following percutaneous or minimally invasive surgery for bunionette deformity correction. Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was undertaken. All clinical studies published in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library Database from inception until December 2023 reporting on the use of percutaneous or minimally invasive osteotomy techniques for bunionette deformity correction were included. The primary outcome was radiographic deformity correction. A meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes was performed to assess the mean difference following surgery. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Results: A total of 942 potential studies were identified, of which 18 were included encompassing 714 feet in 580 patients. There were no comparative studies identified. The majority of studies (n = 14/18) used an unfixed distal osteotomy technique. All studies showed a statistically significant improvement in clinical outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score and visual analog scale for pain) and radiologic outcomes (fourth-fifth intermetatarsal angle and fifth metatarsophalangeal angle). Complication rates ranged from 0% to 21.4%. The nonunion rate was 0% to 5.6%. Overall risk of bias was low to moderate. The most common complication was development of a hypertrophic callus that tended to resorb over time without needing further surgical intervention. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review must be considered in light of the methodologic limitations of the studies analyzed—including additional procedures performed at the same time as the bunionette correction, lack of comparative studies, and heterogeneity of the case series included. Despite these limitations, our review suggests that percutaneous techniques for bunionette deformity correction are generally clinically safe and associated with improvement in radiographic alignment and patient-reported outcome measures.