Nutrients (May 2021)

Dietary Methyl-Group Donor Intake and Breast Cancer Risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)

  • Heleen Van Puyvelde,
  • Nikos Papadimitriou,
  • Joanna Clasen,
  • David Muller,
  • Carine Biessy,
  • Pietro Ferrari,
  • Jytte Halkjær,
  • Kim Overvad,
  • Anne Tjønneland,
  • Renée T. Fortner,
  • Verena Katzke,
  • Matthias B. Schulze,
  • Paolo Chiodini,
  • Giovanna Masala,
  • Valeria Pala,
  • Carlotta Sacerdote,
  • Rosario Tumino,
  • Marije F. Bakker,
  • Antonio Agudo,
  • Eva Ardanaz,
  • María Dolores Chirlaque López,
  • Maria-Jose Sánchez,
  • Ulrika Ericson,
  • Björn Gylling,
  • Therese Karlsson,
  • Jonas Manjer,
  • Julie A. Schmidt,
  • Geneviève Nicolas,
  • Corinne Casagrande,
  • Elisabete Weiderpass,
  • Alicia K. Heath,
  • Lode Godderis,
  • Koen Van Herck,
  • Dirk De Bacquer,
  • Marc J. Gunter,
  • Inge Huybrechts

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13061843
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 6
p. 1843

Abstract

Read online

(1) Background: Methyl-group donors (MGDs), including folate, choline, betaine, and methionine, may influence breast cancer (BC) risk through their role in one-carbon metabolism; (2) Methods: We studied the relationship between dietary intakes of MGDs and BC risk, adopting data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort; (3) Results: 318,686 pre- and postmenopausal women were followed between enrolment in 1992–2000 and December 2013–December 2015. Dietary MGD intakes were estimated at baseline through food-frequency questionnaires. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to quantify the association between dietary intake of MGDs, measured both as a calculated score based on their sum and individually, and BC risk. Subgroup analyses were performed by hormone receptor status, menopausal status, and level of alcohol intake. During a mean follow-up time of 14.1 years, 13,320 women with malignant BC were identified. No associations were found between dietary intakes of the MGD score or individual MGDs and BC risk. However, a potential U-shaped relationship was observed between dietary folate intake and overall BC risk, suggesting an inverse association for intakes up to 350 µg/day compared to a reference intake of 205 µg/day. No statistically significant differences in the associations were observed by hormone receptor status, menopausal status, or level of alcohol intake; (4) Conclusions: There was no strong evidence for an association between MGDs involved in one-carbon metabolism and BC risk. However, a potential U-shaped trend was suggested for dietary folate intake and BC risk. Further research is needed to clarify this association.

Keywords