Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Aug 2023)
Prognosis of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization(MC-hccAI 001): Development and Validation of the ALFP Score
Abstract
Baocuo Gong,1,2,* Xuewen Wang,1,3,* Wanting Guo,1 Hongyi Yang,1 Yanhong Shi,1 Yaying Chen,1 Simiao Gao,1 Jialin Chen,1 Lifang Liu,2 Linbin Lu,1 Xiong Chen1 On behalf of Fujian HCC-biomarker Study Group1Department of Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350025, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Oncology, Oriental Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350025, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350122, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Linbin Lu; Xiong Chen, Department of Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 321 Xihong Road, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350025, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]; [email protected]: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the recommended first-line treatment for intermediate-stage Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, predicting the survival of HCC patients receiving TACE remains challenging.Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed a total of 1805 HCC patients who received TACE. The patients were randomly divided into a training set (n = 1264) and a validation set (n = 541). We examined various prognostic factors within the training set and developed a simple ALFP (ALBI grade, AFP, and Prothrombin time) score, which was subsequently validated using the independent validation set.Results: Our multivariate analysis revealed that baseline ALBI grade 2 or 3, AFP ≥ 100 ng/mL, and PT > 13.1 s were independent unfavorable prognostic factors for HCC patients receiving TACE (p 13.1 s. The score has a range of 0 to 3, and higher scores are associated with poorer outcomes. The median overall survival (OS) varied significantly among different ALFP score groups, both in the training set and the validation set (p