Porcine skeletal muscle typing in histochemical and in-situ RT-PCR analysis

Abstract

Currently, there are plenty of histochemical methods to classify pig muscle fibers, which confused the naming and classification of muscle fibers. This study aims to analyze the difference and correlation of 6 different histochemical methods and select the most suitable method for muscle fiber classification at the molecular and histomological levels by in-situ RT-PCR and enzyme histochemical methods. Muscle fiber samples, including psoas (PM), semitendinosus (SM) and trapezius muscle (TM), were collected from Large Spotted (LS), Lantang (LT) and Landrace (LR) pigs at their market-ages (LS at 150 d, LT at 210 d, and LR at 150 d). 6 kinds of histochemical methods combining actomyosin adenosine triphosphatase (AM-ATPase) with succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme were conducted to differentiate fiber types. 2 types of fibers (I and II) were differentiated by acid 2-fibre (2-AC) or alkaline 2-fibre classification(2-AL), 3 types of fibers (βR, αR and αW) by 3-AC or 3-AL, and 4 types of fibers (I, IIa, IIx and IIb) by 4-AC, or 4-AL. Results showed that AC and AL muscle-fiber classification were consistent in reflecting the characteristics of muscle fibers(P > 0.05), but the color of each muscle fiber type was just opposite. AC methods may be superior to AL methods because of their clear staining background, the sensitivity to staining condition. But there were breed differences and tissue specificity in the optimal preincubation condition. The optimal acid preincubation condition for classifying muscle fibers was pH4.30 for LT, while pH 4.35 for the LS and LR pigs. Meanwhile the optimal acid preincubation condition was pH4.35 for PM, while pH4.40 for TM or SM. For further selection from 2, 3, 4-AC, in-situ RT-PCR was applied to detect the mRNA distribution of myosin heavy chain I (MyHC-I). By combining in-situ PCR with enzyme histochemistry methods, MyHC-I gene and its product – Type I fibrocytes were directly located in cells at both molecular level and morphological level. Compared with the cross-sectional area (CSA) of different muscle fibers (i.e. I, II, βR, αR, αW, IIa, IIx and IIb) identified by enzyme histochemistry, it was found that the CSAs with stronger mRNA expression signal of MyHC-Ⅰ were closer to those of the Type I muscle fiber measured by 4-AC enzyme histochemistry (P > 0.05). Therefore, 4-AC may be considered as the most proper muscle typing method to study muscle fiber typing as well as meat quality. And the combination of in-situ RT-PCR and histochemistry may help better understand porcine muscle fiber characteristics and meat quality in pigs.

Keywords

• Pigs
• Muscle fiber classification
• Enzyme histochemistry
• In-situ RT-PCR