Sequential treatment escalation improves survival in patients with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia

Abstract

Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) is a type of incurable, indolent B-cell lymphoma that is prone to relapse. Over time, treatment strategies have progressed from cytotoxic drugs to rituximab (R)- or bortezomib (V)-based regimens, and have now entered into an era of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)-based regimens. However, the optimal treatment for the relapsed patients is still unclear. Herein, we analyzed the outcomes of the first- and second-line therapies in 377 patients with WM to illustrate the optimal choices for second-line therapy. After a median follow-up of 45.4 months, 89 patients received second-line therapy, and 53 patients were evaluated for response. The major response rates (MRR) of first- and second-line treatment were 65.1% and 67.9% (P = 0.678). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the second-line therapy (PFS2) was shorter than that for the first-line therapy (PFS1) (56.3 vs 40.7 months, P = 0.03). However, PFS2 in targeted drugs group (R-/V-/BTKi-based regimens) was comparable to PFS1 (60.7 months vs 44.7 months, respectively, P = 0.21). Regarding second-line therapy, patients who underwent sequential treatment escalation—such as transitioning from cytotoxic drugs to R-/V-/BTKi-based regimens or from R-/V-based to BTKi-based regimens (escalation group) —had higher MRR (80.6% vs 47.1%, respectively, P = 0.023) and longer PFS2 (50.4 vs 23.5 months, respectively, P < 0.001) compared to the non-escalation group. Patients in the escalation group also had longer post-relapse overall survival compared with the non-escalation group (median, not reached vs 50.7 months, respectively, P = 0.039). Our findings indicate that sequential treatment escalation may improve the survival of patients with WM.