Neural Network-Based Calculator for Rat Glomerular Filtration Rate
Óscar J. Pellicer-Valero,
Giampiero A. Massaro,
Alfredo G. Casanova,
María Paniagua-Sancho,
Isabel Fuentes-Calvo,
Mykola Harvat,
José D. Martín-Guerrero,
Carlos Martínez-Salgado,
Francisco J. López-Hernández
Affiliations
Óscar J. Pellicer-Valero
Intelligent Data Analysis Laboratory (IDAL), Department Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering (ETSE-UV), Universitat de València, 46100 Valencia, Spain
Giampiero A. Massaro
Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
Alfredo G. Casanova
Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
María Paniagua-Sancho
Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
Isabel Fuentes-Calvo
Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
Mykola Harvat
Intelligent Data Analysis Laboratory (IDAL), Department Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering (ETSE-UV), Universitat de València, 46100 Valencia, Spain
José D. Martín-Guerrero
Intelligent Data Analysis Laboratory (IDAL), Department Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering (ETSE-UV), Universitat de València, 46100 Valencia, Spain
Carlos Martínez-Salgado
Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
Francisco J. López-Hernández
Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
Glomerular filtration is a pivotal process of renal physiology, and its alterations are a central pathological event in acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. Creatinine clearance (ClCr), a standard method for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement, requires a long and tedious procedure of timed (usually 24 h) urine collection. We have developed a neural network (NN)-based calculator of rat ClCr from plasma creatinine (pCr) and body weight. For this purpose, matched pCr, weight, and ClCr trios from our historical records on male Wistar rats were used. When evaluated on the training (1165 trios), validation (389), and test sets (660), the model committed an average prediction error of 0.196, 0.178, and 0.203 mL/min and had a correlation coefficient of 0.863, 0.902, and 0.856, respectively. More importantly, for all datasets, the NN seemed especially effective at comparing ClCr among groups within individual experiments, providing results that were often more congruent than those measured experimentally. ACLARA, a friendly interface for this calculator, has been made publicly available to ease and expedite experimental procedures and to enhance animal welfare in alignment with the 3Rs principles by avoiding unnecessary stressing metabolic caging for individual urine collection.