EBioMedicine (Jun 2023)

Evaluation of pre-diagnostic blood protein measurements for predicting survival after lung cancer diagnosisResearch in context

  • Xiaoshuang Feng,
  • David C. Muller,
  • Hana Zahed,
  • Karine Alcala,
  • Florence Guida,
  • Karl Smith-Byrne,
  • Jian-Min Yuan,
  • Woon-Puay Koh,
  • Renwei Wang,
  • Roger L. Milne,
  • Julie K. Bassett,
  • Arnulf Langhammer,
  • Kristian Hveem,
  • Victoria L. Stevens,
  • Ying Wang,
  • Mikael Johansson,
  • Anne Tjønneland,
  • Rosario Tumino,
  • Mahdi Sheikh,
  • Mattias Johansson,
  • Hilary A. Robbins

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 92
p. 104623

Abstract

Read online

Summary: Background: To evaluate whether circulating proteins are associated with survival after lung cancer diagnosis, and whether they can improve prediction of prognosis. Methods: We measured up to 1159 proteins in blood samples from 708 participants in 6 cohorts. Samples were collected within 3 years prior to lung cancer diagnosis. We used Cox proportional hazards models to identify proteins associated with overall mortality after lung cancer diagnosis. To evaluate model performance, we used a round-robin approach in which models were fit in 5 cohorts and evaluated in the 6th cohort. Specifically, we fit a model including 5 proteins and clinical parameters and compared its performance with clinical parameters only. Findings: There were 86 proteins nominally associated with mortality (p < 0.05), but only CDCP1 remained statistically significant after accounting for multiple testing (hazard ratio per standard deviation: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.10–1.30, unadjusted p = 0.00004). The external C-index for the protein-based model was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.61–0.66), compared with 0.62 (95% CI: 0.59–0.64) for the model with clinical parameters only. Inclusion of proteins did not provide a statistically significant improvement in discrimination (C-index difference: 0.015, 95% CI: −0.003 to 0.035). Interpretation: Blood proteins measured within 3 years prior to lung cancer diagnosis were not strongly associated with lung cancer survival, nor did they importantly improve prediction of prognosis beyond clinical information. Funding: No explicit funding for this study. Authors and data collection supported by the US National Cancer Institute (U19CA203654), INCA (France, 2019-1-TABAC-01), Cancer Research Foundation of Northern Sweden (AMP19-962), and Swedish Department of Health Ministry.

Keywords