Frontiers in Oncology (Jun 2023)

Risk-adjusted chemoradiation according to human papilloma viral status for anal cancer: a pilot study

  • William Chu,
  • Amandeep Taggar,
  • Yee Ung,
  • Kelvin K. W. Chan,
  • Craig C. Earle,
  • Craig C. Earle,
  • Aliaksandr Karotki,
  • Mark Pasetka,
  • Joe Presutti,
  • Joe Presutti,
  • John Wong,
  • Liying Zhang,
  • C. Shun Wong

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1183854
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

Background and purposeHPV-associated or positive (HPV+) anal cancer patients may have better outcome compared to those with HPV negative (HPV−) disease. We report a planned interim analysis of a prospective registry study that tailors chemoradiation (CRT) for anal cancer according to HPV status.Materials and methodsHPV+ patients received de-escalated radiation doses of 45, 50.4 and 55.8 Gy, while HPV− received 50.4, 55.8 and 63 Gy for T1, T2 and T3/T4 disease respectively. Chemotherapy consisted of a single dose of mitomycin-C and oral capecitabine on days of RT. All patients were planned by VMAT following CT, PET/CT and MR simulation. This cohort (n = 24) had a minimum 24-month follow-up. Disease free survival (DFS) and local failure rates (LFR) were compared with 180 patients managed by standard CRT (2 cycles of mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil, radiation doses 50.4-63 Gy based on T-category) from 2011-2018. Propensity score comparison was performed using a retrospective to prospective 2 to 1 match based on tumor size and N-category.ResultsIn the HPV+ cohort (n = 20), there were 2 local failures. Two of 4 HPV− patients failed locally. The 30-month DFS and LFR were 79% and 17% respectively. Similar DFS and LFR were observed in the retrospective (80% and 15% respectively) and matched patients (76% and 16% respectively). No grade ≥3 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed in the registry cohort whereas 19% and 14% respectively were seen in the retrospective patients.ConclusionDe-escalation of CRT for HPV+ anal cancer may result in decreased acute toxicities and similar cancer outcomes compared to standard CRT.

Keywords