Heliyon (Jun 2024)

Accuracy of implant height and width measurement with triaxial rotation method based on cone-beam CT

  • Ziyang Hu,
  • Zhengding Yuan,
  • Dantong Cao,
  • Rong Tang,
  • Shu Liu,
  • Shanhui Wen,
  • Antian Gao,
  • Zitong Lin

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 11
p. e32076

Abstract

Read online

Objective: To investigate the accuracy of implant height and width measurement in the mandibular and maxillary first molar region based on cone-beam CT (CBCT) data, and to establish an accurate method for bone measurement in the implant region. Materials and methods: CBCT images of 122 patients with implant in mandibular or maxillary first molar region were retrospectively collected. Two methods were used to measure sagittal height (SH), coronal height (CH), sagittal width (SW), and coronal width (CW) of implants. Method 1 (general method): the images were analyzed using the built-in software NNT 9.0 software. SHl, CHl, SWl, and CWl were measured on the reconstructed sagittal and coronal based on the radiologist’s own experience. Method 2 (triaxial rotation method): the raw data were demonstrated in Expert mode of NNT 9.0 software, in which the coronal axis and sagittal axis were rotated paralleling to the long axis of the implant for reconstruction, and then SH2, CH2, SW2, and CW2 were measured on the reconstructed sagittal and coronal images. The results of two methods were compared with the actual implant size (H0, W0). Paired T-test was performed for statistical analysis. Dahlberg formula was used to check the measurement error. Results: For method 1, there was no significant differences between SHl and H0 (P > 0.05), but significant differences between CHl and H0, SWl and W0, and CWl and W0 (P 0.05). The random error range measured using Dahlberg formula was 0.157–1.171 mm for general method and 0.017–0.05 mm for triaxial rotation method. Conclusion: The triaxial rotation method is accurate for implant height and width measurements on CBCT images and could be used in pre-operatively bone height and width measurement of potential implant sites.

Keywords