European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context (Jun 2019)

Exploring Typology Categorizations of Male Perpetrators: A Methodology Study

  • Emily N. Weber,
  • Ashley R. Taylor,
  • Arthur L. Cantos,
  • Barbara G. Amado,
  • K. Daniel O’Leary

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2019a5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 2
pp. 93 – 97

Abstract

Read online

Intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators were categorized based on whether they were generally violent (GV) or family only violent (FO) using self-report or arrest records. Classification criteria to assess recidivism in perpetrators of IPV were evaluated herein to determine the incremental validity of using a perpetrator’s criminal history in addition to their self-report information for categorization purposes. The concordance rates for categorizing subtypes of male perpetrators were compared for two methods, namely, self-report versus criminal history data. Categorizations were made based on self-reported history of violence and federal criminal records separately. Between measures consistency was defined as whether or not the self-report categorizations matched federal criminal record categorizations. It was hypothesized that self-report would not be sufficient as the sole method of categorizing male perpetrators, and the use of criminal history data would add to the validity of the categorization system. Self-reports of aggression were higher than criminal records of aggression. Using data sources together may yield the best outcomes for offenders and society. Implications are discussed.

Keywords