Enhanced HPLC Method for Boar Taint Quantification
R. Pereira‐Pinto,
M. Barros,
M. Vaz‐Velho,
F. Mata,
P. Pires
Affiliations
R. Pereira‐Pinto
CISAS – Centre for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares 4900-347 Viana do Castelo Portugal
M. Barros
CISAS – Centre for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares 4900-347 Viana do Castelo Portugal
M. Vaz‐Velho
CISAS – Centre for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares 4900-347 Viana do Castelo Portugal
F. Mata
CISAS – Centre for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares 4900-347 Viana do Castelo Portugal
P. Pires
CISAS – Centre for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares 4900-347 Viana do Castelo Portugal
Abstract Boar taint is an unpleasant odour found in the carcasses of entire male pigs, resulting from androstenone and skatole accumulation during pubertal development, and impacting pork quality. This study proposes the validation of an adapted chromatographic method for quantifying skatole and androstenone in the pigs’ liquid fat using fluorescence detection. A good chromatographic separation was achieved, with skatole (SKA) and androstenone (AND) elution at 4.4 and 9.9 min., respectively. An external calibration method was applied, with calibration curves correlation coefficient of 0.9999 for both analytes. Detection limit values were 1.53 and 16.02 ng/g for SKA and AND, respectively. SKA recovery was 99.72±2.34 % (2.34 % RSD) and 102.84±1.62 % (1.57 % RSD) for AND. Results showed good precision values (repeatability <2.46 % RSD for SKA, <6.85 % RSD for AND; intermediate precision <2.87 % RSD for SKA, <6.98 % RSD for AND). The method‘s robustness was tested and the values were within the reference ranges. The validation results proved that the adaptation of an existing method resulted in good assessments of robustness, reliability and accuracy.