Agriculture (Jun 2021)

The Response of Soil pH and Exchangeable Al to Alum and Lime Amendments

  • Christopher Jorelle Gillespie,
  • João Arthur Antonangelo,
  • Hailin Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060547
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 6
p. 547

Abstract

Read online

Intensive cultivation and unprecedented utilization of ammoniacal fertilizer has accelerated soil acidification in the southern Great Plains and many other parts of the world. During a two-year study that evaluated the impact of soil pH and aluminum (Al) toxicity on winter wheat yield potential, we observed a variance in the edaphic responses of the two study sites (Stillwater and Chickasha) to two soil amendments, Alum [Al2(SO4)3] and lime [Ca(OH)2]. We found that AlKCl values at Stillwater were 223% and 150% higher than Chickasha during Year 1 and Year 2, respectively, with similar soil pH. Additionally, Alsat values at Stillwater were 30.6% and 24.9% higher than Chickasha during Year 1 and Year 2, respectively. Surprisingly, when treated as a bivariate of Alsat, soil buffer indices differed in graphical structure. While Chickasha was identified with a cubic polynomial (p p +2 species in acidic soils.

Keywords