Journal of Clinical and Translational Science (Jan 2024)

Evaluation of a peer-led research best practices training for community health workers and promotoras

  • Susan L. Murphy,
  • Alexandra E. Harper,
  • Gina M. Jay,
  • Vanessa I. Trujillo,
  • Kristen Weeks-Norton,
  • Elias Samuels,
  • Jonathan P. Troost,
  • Brenda Eakin,
  • Gretchen Piatt,
  • Catherine Striley,
  • Analay Perez,
  • Shannen McIntosh,
  • Daphne C. Watkins,
  • Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola,
  • Linda Cottler

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.593
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction: Community health workers and promotoras (CHW/Ps) increasingly support research conducted in communities but receive variable or no training. We developed a culturally and linguistically tailored research best practices course for CHW/Ps that can be taken independently or in facilitated groups. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the facilitated training. Methods: CHW/Ps were recruited from communities and partners affiliated with study sites in Michigan, Florida, and California. They participated in virtual or in-person training facilitated by a peer in English or Spanish and then completed a survey about their abilities (i.e., knowledge and skills for participating in research-related work) and perceptions of the training. Linear regression analyses were used to examine differences in training experience across several factors. Results: A total of 394 CHW/Ps, mean age 41.6 ± 13.8 years, completed the training and survey (n = 275 English; 119 Spanish). Most CHW/Ps were female (80%), and 50% identified as Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish. Over 95% of CHW/Ps rated their abilities as improved after training; 98% agreed the course was relevant to their work and felt the training was useful. Small differences were observed between training sites. Discussion: Most CHW/Ps rated the training positively and noted improved knowledge and skills for engaging in research-related work. Despite slight site differences, the training was well received, and CHW/Ps appreciated having a facilitator with experience working in community-based settings. This course offers a standard and scalable approach to training the CHW/P workforce. Future studies can examine its uptake and effect on research quality.

Keywords