Neurological Research and Practice (Nov 2022)

Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

  • Liesa Regner-Nelke,
  • Marc Pawlitzki,
  • Alice Willison,
  • Leoni Rolfes,
  • Sinem-Hilal Oezalp,
  • Christopher Nelke,
  • Tristan Kölsche,
  • Melanie Korsen,
  • Matthias Grothe,
  • Sergiu Groppa,
  • Felix Luessi,
  • Sinah Engel,
  • Gereon Nelles,
  • Eckhard Bonmann,
  • Holger Roick,
  • Anke Friedrich,
  • Philipp Knorn,
  • Harald Landefeld,
  • Zoltan Biro,
  • Michael Ernst,
  • Antonios Bayas,
  • Martina Menacher,
  • Katja Akgün,
  • Christoph Kleinschnitz,
  • Tobias Ruck,
  • Tjalf Ziemssen,
  • Refik Pul,
  • Sven G. Meuth

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00219-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Therapeutic options targeting inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) have evolved rapidly for relapsing–remitting MS, whereas few therapies are available for progressive forms of MS, in particular secondary progressive MS (SPMS). The approval of siponimod for SPMS has allowed for optimism in the otherwise discouraging therapeutic landscape. Methods We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, non-interventional study analyzing the efficacy and safety of siponimod under real-world conditions in 227 SPMS patients. According to the retrospective study framework, data was acquired at prespecified time points. Clinical readouts were assessed every three months. Disease progression was determined as increase in expanded disability status scale (EDSS), radiological progression, or the occurrence of new relapses under treatment. For safety analyses, adverse events (AE) and reasons for discontinuation were documented. The collected data points were analyzed at baseline and after 6, 12 and 18 months. However, data were predominately collected at the 6- and 12-month time points as many patients were lost to follow-up. In a group consisting of 41 patients, a more detailed investigation regarding disease progression was conducted, including data from measurement of cognitive and motoric functions. Results Under siponimod therapy, 64.8% of patients experienced sustained clinical disease stability at 12 months. Out of the stable patients 21.4% of patients improved. Of the remaining patients, 31.5% experienced EDSS progression, 3.7% worsened without meeting the threshold for progression. Relapses occurred in 7.4%. Radiological disease activity was detected in 24.1% of patients after six months of treatment and in 29.6% of patients at 12 months follow-up. The in-depth cohort consisting of 41 patients demonstrated no substantial changes in cognitive abilities measured by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and Symbol Digit Modalities Test or motoric functions measured with Timed 25-Foot Walk, 100-m timed test, and 9-Hole Peg Test throughout the 12-month study period. Radiological assessment showed a stable volume of white and grey matter, as well as a stable lesion count at 12 months follow-up. AE were observed in nearly half of the included patients, with lymphopenia being the most common. Due to disease progression or AE, 31.2% of patients discontinued therapy. Conclusion Treatment with siponimod had an overall stabilizing effect regarding clinical and radiological outcome measures. However, there is a need for more intensive treatment management and monitoring to identify disease progression and AE.

Keywords