Clinical Epidemiology (Feb 2024)
Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017
Abstract
Kamille Herskind,1 Peter Bjødstrup Jensen,1 Christina Anne Vinter,2– 4 Lone Krebs,5,6 Lene Friis Eskildsen,5 Anne Broe,1,7 Anton Pottegård,1 Mette Bliddal1,8 1Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy, and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 2Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; 3Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 4Steno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; 6Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 7IQVIA, London, UK; 8Research Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DenmarkCorrespondence: Mette Bliddal, OPEN, Heden 16, St.tv, Odense, 5000, Denmark, Tel +45 2943 7912, Email [email protected]: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the validity of variables related to pregnancy, delivery, and key characteristics of the infant in the Danish National Patient Register using maternal medical records as the reference standard.Patients and Methods: We reviewed medical records of 1264 women giving birth in the Region of Southern Denmark during 2017. We calculated positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity to estimate the validity of 49 selected variables.Results: The PPV was ≥ 0.90 on most pregnancy-related variables including parity, pre-gestational BMI, diabetes disorders, and previous cesarean section, while it was lower for hypertensive disorders, especially mild to moderate preeclampsia (0.49, 95% CI 0.32– 0.66). Sensitivity ranged from 0.80 to 1.00 on all pregnancy-related variables, except hypertensive disorders (sensitivity 0.38– 0.71, lowest for severe preeclampsia). On most delivery-related variables including obstetric surgical procedures (eg cesarean section and induction of labor), pharmacological pain-relief, and gestational age at delivery, PPV’s ranged from 0.98 to 1.00 and the corresponding sensitivities from 0.87 to 1.00. Regarding infant-related variables, both the APGAR score registered five minutes after delivery and birthweight yielded a PPV of 1.00.Conclusion: Obstetric coding in the Danish National Patient Register shows very high validity and completeness making it a valuable source for epidemiologic research.Plain Language Summary: Danish register data are often used for epidemiological research in reproduction. The registers are based on coded information to the registers based on information from medical records. The quality of the register data is highly dependent of the validity of the codes. Yet there is a lack in our knowledge of the validity of data related to pregnancy, childbirth, and the characteristics of the newborn baby. We therefore aimed to validate the Danish National Patient Registry data related to pregnancy and childbirth by comparing the registered code with information from the medical records.We scrutinized medical records from 1264 women giving birth in the Region of Southern Denmark during 2017. We compared the registration in the medical record with the registered code in the Danish National Patient Registry by calculating how accurate the register data are according to 49 different variables.Results showed that registered codes in the Patient Registry for pregnancy- and childbirth-related conditions and key infant characteristics were to a high degree in agreement with the data from the medical report with few exceptions.In conclusion, the study revealed that the Danish National Patient Register provides highly accurate and comprehensive data for most pregnancy, delivery, and infant-related variables. This underscores the register’s value as a reliable source for epidemiologic research in reproductive health.Keywords: registries, sensitivity and specificity, validity, epidemiology, pregnancy, delivery
