Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (Feb 2024)

Analytical validation and clinical utilization of K-4CARE™: a comprehensive genomic profiling assay with personalized MRD detection

  • Thien-Phuc Nguyen Hoang,
  • Thien-Phuc Nguyen Hoang,
  • Tien Anh Nguyen,
  • Tien Anh Nguyen,
  • Nam H. B. Tran,
  • Nam H. B. Tran,
  • Van-Anh Nguyen Hoang,
  • Van-Anh Nguyen Hoang,
  • Hong Thuy Thi Dao,
  • Hong Thuy Thi Dao,
  • Vu-Uyen Tran,
  • Vu-Uyen Tran,
  • Yen Nhi Nguyen,
  • Yen Nhi Nguyen,
  • Anh Tuan Nguyen,
  • Anh Tuan Nguyen,
  • Cam Tu Nguyen Thi,
  • Cam Tu Nguyen Thi,
  • Thanh Thuy Do Thi,
  • Duy Sinh Nguyen,
  • Duy Sinh Nguyen,
  • Hoai-Nghia Nguyen,
  • Hoai-Nghia Nguyen,
  • Hoa Giang,
  • Hoa Giang,
  • Lan N. Tu,
  • Lan N. Tu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2024.1334808
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

Background: Biomarker testing has gradually become standard of care in precision oncology to help physicians select optimal treatment for patients. Compared to single-gene or small gene panel testing, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has emerged as a more time- and tissue-efficient method. This study demonstrated in-depth analytical validation of K-4CARE, a CGP assay that integrates circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) tracking for residual cancer surveillance.Methods: The assay utilized a panel of 473 cancer-relevant genes with a total length of 1.7 Mb. Reference standards were used to evaluate limit of detection (LOD), concordance, sensitivity, specificity and precision of the assay to detect single nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertion/deletions (Indels), gene amplification and fusion, microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB). The assay was then benchmarked against orthogonal methods using 155 clinical samples from 10 cancer types. In selected cancers, top tumor-derived somatic mutations, as ranked by our proprietary algorithm, were used to detect ctDNA in the plasma.Results: For detection of somatic SNVs and Indels, gene fusion and amplification, the assay had sensitivity of >99%, 94% and >99% respectively, and specificity of >99%. Detection of germline variants also achieved sensitivity and specificity of >99%. For TMB measurement, the correlation coefficient between whole-exome sequencing and our targeted panel was 97%. MSI analysis when benchmarked against polymerase chain reaction method showed sensitivity of 94% and specificity of >99%. The concordance between our assay and the TruSight Oncology 500 assay for detection of somatic variants, TMB and MSI measurement was 100%, 89%, and 98% respectively. When CGP-informed mutations were used to personalize ctDNA tracking, the detection rate of ctDNA in liquid biopsy was 79%, and clinical utility in cancer surveillance was demonstrated in 2 case studies.Conclusion: K-4CARE™ assay provides comprehensive and reliable genomic information that fulfills all guideline-based biomarker testing for both targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Integration of ctDNA tracking helps clinicians to further monitor treatment response and ultimately provide well-rounded care to cancer patients.

Keywords