PLoS ONE (Jan 2016)

Two Different Views on the World Around Us: The World of Uniformity versus Diversity.

  • JaeHwan Kwon,
  • Dhananjay Nayakankuppam

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168589
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 12
p. e0168589

Abstract

Read online

We propose that when individuals believe in fixed traits of personality (entity theorists), they are likely to expect a world of "uniformity." As such, they easily infer a population statistic from a small sample of data with confidence. In contrast, individuals who believe in malleable traits of personality (incremental theorists) are likely to presume a world of "diversity," such that they "hesitate" to infer a population statistic from a similarly sized sample. In four laboratory experiments, we found that compared to incremental theorists, entity theorists estimated a population mean from a sample with a greater level of confidence (Studies 1a and 1b), expected more homogeneity among the entities within a population (Study 2), and perceived an extreme value to be more indicative of an outlier (Study 3). These results suggest that individuals are likely to use their implicit self-theory orientations (entity theory versus incremental theory) to see a population in general as a constitution either of homogeneous or heterogeneous entities.