Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (Feb 2024)

Variability of intervertebral joint stiffness between specimens and spine levels

  • Samuele L. Gould,
  • Samuele L. Gould,
  • Giorgio Davico,
  • Giorgio Davico,
  • Christian Liebsch,
  • Hans-Joachim Wilke,
  • Luca Cristofolini,
  • Marco Viceconti,
  • Marco Viceconti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1372088
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Musculoskeletal multibody models of the spine can be used to investigate the biomechanical behaviour of the spine. In this context, a correct characterisation of the passive mechanical properties of the intervertebral joint is crucial. The intervertebral joint stiffness, in particular, is typically derived from the literature, and the differences between individuals and spine levels are often disregarded.Methods: This study tested if an optimisation method of personalising the intervertebral joint stiffnesses was able to capture expected stiffness variation between specimens and between spine levels and if the variation between spine levels could be accurately captured using a generic scaling ratio. Multibody models of six T12 to sacrum spine specimens were created from computed tomography data. For each specimen, two models were created: one with uniform stiffnesses across spine levels, and one accounting for level dependency. Three loading conditions were simulated. The initial stiffness values were optimised to minimize the kinematic error.Results: There was a range of optimised stiffnesses across the specimens and the models with level dependent stiffnesses were less accurate than the models without. Using an optimised stiffness substantially reduced prediction errors.Discussion: The optimisation captured the expected variation between specimens, and the prediction errors demonstrated the importance of accounting for level dependency. The inaccuracy of the predicted kinematics for the level-dependent models indicated that a generic scaling ratio is not a suitable method to account for the level dependency. The variation in the optimised stiffnesses for the different loading conditions indicates personalised stiffnesses should also be considered load-specific.

Keywords