Participation as the Essence of Good Governance: Some General Reflections and a Case Study on the Arctic Council

Arctic Review on Law and Politics. 2017;8(0):139-159 DOI 10.23865/arctic.v8.714

 

Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Arctic Review on Law and Politics

ISSN: 1891-6252 (Print); 2387-4562 (Online)

Publisher: Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP

Society/Institution: Arctic University of Norway, Faculty of Law

LCC Subject Category: Law

Country of publisher: Norway

Language of fulltext: Norwegian, English

Full-text formats available: PDF, HTML, ePUB, XML

 

AUTHORS

Margherita Paola Poto (K.G. Jebsen Centre for the Law of the Sea, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway)
Lara Fornabaio (University of Ferrara, Italy)

EDITORIAL INFORMATION

Double blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 24 weeks

 

Abstract | Full Text

The present contribution explores aspects of good governance on the global dimension with participation as one of the key elements of a well-governed system, focusing on the Arctic Council’s (AC) commitment to enhance indigenous peoples’ participation in the environmental decision-making process.The paper starts with a reflection on the revolutionary impact that new technologies have had on legal reasoning over the last three decades. A new revolutionary way of thinking based on easier access to information and enhanced interaction has increased the connectivity and complexity of relationships between actors in the global arena, by improving opportunities for them to be part of the decision-making process.Part I, Section II provides a critical analysis of the global governance phenomenon. Global dynamics are analyzed from a historical perspective, from their origin in the communication realm to their application in administrative law. In Part I, Section III, the scrutiny shifts to the meaning of good governance and its core principles, in which participation plays the role of protagonist.Part II investigates the role of the Arctic Council through the lens of good governance tools, with particular focus on recognition of the “permanent participant” status of indigenous groups as an example on non-State actors’ engagement in decisions regarding the environment. Propositions on possible ways to re-launch the Arctic Council’s role as a platform for new forms of participation, peaceful resolution and environmental protection conclude the article.