Importance of Visual Estimation of Coronary Artery Stenoses and Use of Functional Evaluation for Appropriate Guidance of Coronary Revascularization—Multiple Operator Evaluation
Lucian Calmac,
Nicoleta-Monica Popa-Fotea,
Vlad Bataila,
Vlad Ploscaru,
Adrian Turea,
Irina Andra Tache,
Diana Stoian,
Lucian Itu,
Elisabeta Badila,
Alexandru Scafa-Udriste,
Maria Dorobantu
Affiliations
Lucian Calmac
Department of Cardiology, Emergency Clinical Hospital, 8 Calea Floreasca, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
Nicoleta-Monica Popa-Fotea
Department of Cardiology, Emergency Clinical Hospital, 8 Calea Floreasca, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
Vlad Bataila
Department of Cardiology, Emergency Clinical Hospital, 8 Calea Floreasca, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
Vlad Ploscaru
Department of Cardiology, Emergency Clinical Hospital, 8 Calea Floreasca, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
Adrian Turea
Department of Image Fusion and Analytics, Siemens SRL, 78 B-dul 15 Noiembrie, 5000978 Brasov, Romania
Irina Andra Tache
Department of Image Fusion and Analytics, Siemens SRL, 78 B-dul 15 Noiembrie, 5000978 Brasov, Romania
Diana Stoian
Department of Image Fusion and Analytics, Siemens SRL, 78 B-dul 15 Noiembrie, 5000978 Brasov, Romania
Lucian Itu
Department of Image Fusion and Analytics, Siemens SRL, 78 B-dul 15 Noiembrie, 5000978 Brasov, Romania
Elisabeta Badila
Department of Cardiology, Emergency Clinical Hospital, 8 Calea Floreasca, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
Alexandru Scafa-Udriste
Department of Cardiology, Emergency Clinical Hospital, 8 Calea Floreasca, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
Maria Dorobantu
Department Cardio-Thoracic, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 8 Eroii Sanitari, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
Background: Visual estimation (VE) of coronary stenoses is the first step during invasive coronary angiography. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of VE together with invasive functional assessment (IFA) in defining the functional significance (FS) of coronary stenoses based on the opinion of multiple operators. Methods: Fourteen independent operators visually evaluated 133 coronary lesions which had a previous FFR measurement, indicating the degree of stenosis (DS), FS and IFA intention. We determined the accuracy of FS prediction using several scenarios combining individual and group decision, considering IFA as deemed necessary by the operator or only in intermediate lesions. Results: The accuracy of VE in predicting FS was largely variable between operators (average 66.1%); it improved significantly when IFA was used either as per operator’s opinion (86.3%; p p p = 0.166). The poorest accuracy of VE for FS was obtained in intermediate DS lesions (59.1%). Conclusions: There are significant inter-observer differences in reporting the degree of DS, while the accuracy of VE prediction of FS is also largely dependent on the operator, and the worst performance is obtained in the evaluation of intermediate DS.