Acute echocardiographic and hemodynamic response to his‐bundle pacing in patients with first‐degree atrioventricular block

Abstract

Abstract Background Atrial pacing and right ventricular (RV) pacing are both associated with adverse outcomes among patients with first‐degree atrioventricular block (1°AVB). His‐bundle pacing (HBP) provides physiological activation of the ventricle and may be able to improve both atrioventricular (AV) and inter‐ventricular synchrony in 1°AVB patients. This study evaluates the acute echocardiographic and hemodynamic effects of atrial, atrial‐His‐bundle sequential (AH), and atrial‐ventricular (AV) sequential pacing in 1°AVB patients. Methods Patients with 1°AVB undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation were included. Following left atrial (LA) catheterization, patients underwent atrial, AH‐ and AV‐sequential pacing. LA/left ventricular (LV) pressure and echocardiographic measurements during the pacing protocols were compared. Results Thirteen patients with 1°AVB (mean PR 221 ± 26 ms) were included. The PR interval was prolonged with atrial pacing compared to baseline (275 ± 73 ms, p = .005). LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was highest during atrial pacing (62 ± 11%), intermediate with AH‐sequential pacing (59 ± 7%), and lowest with AV‐sequential pacing (57 ± 12%) though these differences were not statistically significant. No significant differences were found in LA or LV mean pressures or LV dP/dT. LA and LV volumes, isovolumetric times, electromechanical delays, and global longitudinal strains were similar across pacing protocols. Conclusion Despite pronounced PR prolongation, the acute effects of atrial pacing were not significantly different than AH‐ or AV‐sequential pacing. Normalizing atrioventricular and/or inter‐ventricular dyssynchrony did not result in acute improvements in cardiac output or loading conditions.

Keywords

• echocardiography
• EP study
• first‐degree AV‐block
• His‐bundle
• pacing