PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Effect of ventilation rate on recovery after cardiac arrest in a pediatric animal model.

  • Jorge López,
  • Patricia Arias,
  • Beatriz Domenech,
  • Daniel Horcajo,
  • Juan Pablo Nocete,
  • Laura Zamora,
  • Sarah Nicole Fernández,
  • Jesús López-Herce

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237736
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 8
p. e0237736

Abstract

Read online

AimsTo assess the impact of two different respiratory rates in hemodynamic, perfusion and ventilation parameters in a pediatric animal model of cardiac arrest (CA).MethodsAn experimental randomized controlled trial was carried out in 50 piglets under asphyxial CA. After ROSC, they were randomized into two groups: 20 and 30 respirations per minute (rpm). Hemodynamic, perfusion and ventilation parameters were measured 10 minutes after asphyxia, just before ROSC and at 5, 15, 30 and 60 minutes after ROSC. Independent medians test, Kruskal-Wallis test and χ2 test, were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Spearman's Rho was used to assess correlation between continuous variables. A p-value ResultsArterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) was significantly lower in the 30 rpm group after 15 minutes (41 vs. 54.5 mmHg, p ConclusionsThis animal model of asphyxial CA shows that a respiratory rate of 30 rpm is more effective to reach normoventilation than 20 rpm in piglets after ROSC. This ventilation strategy seems to be safe, as it does not cause hyperventilation and does not affect hemodynamics or cerebral tissue perfusion.