Applied Sciences (Aug 2020)

Antihypertensive Effect of Amaranth Hydrolysate Is Comparable to the Effect of Low-Intensity Physical Activity

  • Francisco Cabrera-Chávez,
  • Veronica Lopez-Teros,
  • Perla Yareli Gutiérrez-Arzapalo,
  • Feliznando Isidro Cárdenas-Torres,
  • Efren Rafael Rios-Burgueño,
  • Humberto Astiazaran-Garcia,
  • José Aldo Hernández Murúa,
  • Guadalupe González-Ochoa,
  • Giovanni Isaí Ramírez-Torres,
  • Noé Ontiveros

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165706
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 16
p. 5706

Abstract

Read online

Background and objectives: Both antihypertensive peptide intake and physical activity help to control blood pressure. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of consuming amaranth antihypertensive peptides on systolic blood pressure (SBP) in normotensive rats and the magnitude and relevance of the peptide-induced antihypertensive effect in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Materials and Methods: Treatments (alcalase-generated amaranth protein hydrolysate, captopril, or water) were given by gavage and the SBP measured by the tail-cuff method. Physical activity was performed five days/week (for twenty weeks). Results: The normotensive rats’ SBP (mmHg, average/group) remained unaffected after amaranth antihypertensive peptide supplementation (121.8) (p > 0.05 vs controls). In SHR, the SBP was lowered by 24.6 (sedentary/supplemented at two weeks), 42.0 (sedentary/supplemented at eight weeks), and 31.5 (exercised/non-supplemented at eight weeks) (p p p > 0.05 vs sedentary/supplemented at eight weeks or exercised/non-supplemented at eight weeks). Conclusions: Amaranth antihypertensive peptide supplementation has no impact on SBP in normotensive rats. This supplementation develops sustained antihypertensive benefits in SHR, which are similar to the antihypertensive effect developed after eight- or twenty-week low-intensity physical activity. These findings have implications for developing safe and effective peptide-based functional foods.

Keywords