PLoS Medicine (Jan 2021)

Mindfulness-based programmes for mental health promotion in adults in nonclinical settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

  • Julieta Galante,
  • Claire Friedrich,
  • Anna F Dawson,
  • Marta Modrego-Alarcón,
  • Pia Gebbing,
  • Irene Delgado-Suárez,
  • Radhika Gupta,
  • Lydia Dean,
  • Tim Dalgleish,
  • Ian R White,
  • Peter B Jones

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003481
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
p. e1003481

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThere is an urgent need for mental health promotion in nonclinical settings. Mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) are being widely implemented to reduce stress, but a comprehensive evidence synthesis is lacking. We reviewed trials to assess whether MBPs promote mental health relative to no intervention or comparator interventions.Methods and findingsFollowing a detailed preregistered protocol (PROSPERO CRD42018105213) developed with public and professional stakeholders, 13 databases were searched to August 2020 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining in-person, expert-defined MBPs in nonclinical settings. Two researchers independently selected, extracted, and appraised trials using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool 2.0. Primary outcomes were psychometrically validated anxiety, depression, psychological distress, and mental well-being questionnaires at 1 to 6 months after programme completion. Multiple testing was performed using p ConclusionsCompared with taking no action, MBPs of the included studies promote mental health in nonclinical settings, but given the heterogeneity between studies, the findings do not support generalisation of MBP effects across every setting. MBPs may have specific effects on some common mental health symptoms. Other preventative interventions may be equally effective. Implementation of MBPs in nonclinical settings should be partnered with thorough research to confirm findings and learn which settings are most likely to benefit.