Parasites & Vectors (Jun 2015)

Karyotypic assignment of Sri Lankan Anopheles culicifacies species B and E does not correlate with cytochrome oxidase subunit I and microsatellite genotypes

  • Sinnathamby N. Surendran,
  • Nathan Truelove,
  • Devojit K. Sarma,
  • Pavilupillai J. Jude,
  • Ranjan Ramasamy,
  • Kanapathy Gajapathy,
  • Lalanthika B. S. Peiris,
  • S. H. P. Parakrama Karunaratne,
  • Catherine Walton

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0944-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 1 – 6

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The identification of species B and E in the Anopheles culicifacies complex in the Indian subcontinent has been based on Y-chromosome karyotype. Since no detectable variations were previously found in DNA markers commonly used for sibling species identification, further molecular characterization using cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and microsatellite markers was carried out on Y-chromosome karyotyped Anopheles culicifacies specie B and E from Unnichchai, Kallady and Ranawarunawa in Sri Lanka. Findings COI sequence analysis (n = 22) revealed the presence of nine unique haplotypes with six in each species. Three haplotypes were shared by both species. The two sibling species had a pairwise FST value of 1.338 (p < 0.05) with the number of migrants (Nm) value <1. The genetic structure analysis resulted in two genetic clusters not 100 % associated with karyotypes. While none of the species B were incorrectly assigned two were inconclusive. Five out of 26 specimens karyotyped as species E were incorrectly assigned, while further 9 were inconclusive. Conclusions The new molecular data support the existence of two genetically different populations of the Culicifacies Complex in Sri Lanka that are not associated with the Y-chromosome karyotype. Detailed analysis with more microsatellite markers and assortative mating experiments are needed to establish the presence of the two genetically distinct populations and relate them to Y-chromosome morphology.

Keywords