Preventive Medicine Reports (Mar 2020)

The availability of retail tobacco near federally qualified healthcare facilities and addiction treatment centers in New York State

  • Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel,
  • Alexa R. Romberg,
  • Jeffrey G. Willett,
  • Elexis C. Kierstead,
  • Adam F. Benson,
  • Haijun Xiao,
  • Alison F. Cuccia,
  • Jodie C. Briggs,
  • Barbara A. Schillo,
  • Elizabeth C. Hair,
  • Donna M. Vallone

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17

Abstract

Read online

The effectiveness of tobacco control policies that create smoke-free healthcare facilities and encourage the delivery of tobacco dependence treatment may be undermined by the availability of retail tobacco in the surrounding environments. This study examined the availability of retail tobacco in relation to: federally qualified health centers and look-a-like (FQHC/LAL) healthcare facilities (n = 706) as well as substance abuse and addiction treatment centers (n = 953) across New York State (NYS) in 2018. A statewide tobacco retailer density surface using static-bandwidth kernel density estimation was constructed from geocoded licensed tobacco vendors (n = 21,314). For each healthcare facility, tobacco retailer density (retailers per square mile) was extracted from the underlying NYS density surface. Proximity from each healthcare facility to the nearest tobacco vendor was calculated in walkable miles. Across NYS, tobacco retailer density ranged from 0 to 41.02 retailers per square mile. The availability of retailer tobacco near FQHC/LAL healthcare facilities and substance abuse and addiction treatment centers was higher in metropolitan areas than less urban areas as expected. School-based FQHC/LAL healthcare facilities had higher density than all other FQHC/LAL healthcare facilities types (Mean = 20.82 vs. 17.04, p = 0.0042), while opioid abuse and addiction treatment centers had on average higher density (Mean = 20.42 vs. 9.81, p < 0.0001) and closer proximity to a tobacco vendor (Mean = 0.14 vs. 0.36, p < 0.0001) than other substance abuse and addiction treatment centers. State and local tobacco control retailer reduction policies should be considered to reduce the availability of retail tobacco surrounding these facilities. Keywords: Tobacco, Retail environment, Proximity, Density, Healthcare facilities