Is the Bulbar Urethral Stricture a Single and Uniform Disease?

Abstract

Objectives: Proximal and distal bulbar urethral strictures (BUS) have different disease characteristics and require different treatment strategies despite being regarded as a single condition. To clarify the differences, we analyzed our database by distinguishing the two types of BUS. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 196 patients with BUS who underwent urethroplasty at the National Defense Medical College (Japan) between August 2004 and March 2022. We divided patients into proximal (group 1) or distal (group 2) groups based on the stricture segment and compared patient background and surgical techniques for each group. We assessed whether the stricture segment was an independent predictive factor for substitution urethroplasty selection using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The recurrence rates were calculated and compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, respectively. Results: Patients in group 1 had a less frequent non-obliterated lumen (73% vs. 94%, p = 0.020) and significantly shorter strictures (10 mm vs. 23 mm, p p = 0.010) than those in group 2. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the stricture segment (distal) (p p p = 0.030), and a non-obliterated lumen (p = 0.020) were independent predictive factors for substitution urethroplasty. However, the recurrence rate (p = 0.18) did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusions: Proximal and distal BUS have substantially different anatomical characteristics and etiologies and require different reconstructive techniques.

Keywords

• surgery
• diagnosis
• etiology
• urethral stricture