PLoS ONE (Jan 2014)

The cost-utility of CT angiography and conventional angiography for people presenting with intracerebral hemorrhage.

  • Richard I Aviv,
  • Adam G Kelly,
  • Babak S Jahromi,
  • Curtis G Benesch,
  • Kate C Young

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096496
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 5
p. e96496

Abstract

Read online

OBJECTIVE:To determine the optimal imaging strategy for ICH incorporating CTA or DSA with and without a NCCT risk stratification algorithm. METHODS:A Markov model included costs, outcomes, prevalence of a vascular lesion, and the sensitivity and specificity of a risk stratification algorithm from the literature. The four imaging strategies were: (a) CTA screening of the entire cohort; (b) CTA only in those where NCCT suggested a high or indeterminate likelihood of a lesion; (c) DSA screening of the entire cohort and (d) DSA only for those with a high or indeterminate suspicion of a lesion following NCCT. Branch d was the comparator. RESULTS:Age of the cohort and the probability of an underlying lesion influenced the choice of optimal imaging strategy. With a low suspicion for a lesion (15%, branch (b) became preferred strategy. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that branch (b) was the optimal choice 70-72% of the time over varying willingness-to-pay values. CONCLUSIONS:CTA has a clear role in the evaluation of people presenting with ICH, though the choice of CTA everyone or CTA using risk stratification depends on age and likelihood of finding a lesion.