Plants (May 2023)

Comparison of Phytochemical Composition and Untargeted Metabolomic Analysis of an Extract from <i>Cnidoscolus aconitifolius</i> (Mill.) I. I. Johnst and <i>Porophyllum ruderale</i> (Jacq.) Cass. and Biological Cytotoxic and Antiproliferative Activity In Vitro

  • Ángel Félix Vargas-Madriz,
  • Ivan Luzardo-Ocampo,
  • Ulisses Moreno-Celis,
  • Octavio Roldán-Padrón,
  • Jorge Luis Chávez-Servín,
  • Haydé A. Vergara-Castañeda,
  • Mónica Martínez-Pacheco,
  • Carmen Mejía,
  • Teresa García-Gasca,
  • Aarón Kuri-García

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12101987
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 10
p. 1987

Abstract

Read online

Cnidoscolus aconitifolius (CA) and Porophyllum ruderale (PR) are representative edible plants that are a traditional food source in Mexico. This research aimed to analyze the phytochemical composition and untargeted metabolomics analysis of CA and PR and evaluate their antiproliferative effect in vitro. The phytochemical composition (UPLC-DAD-QToF/MS-ESI) identified up to 38 polyphenols and selected organic acids that were clustered by the untargeted metabolomics in functional activities linked to indolizidines, pyridines, and organic acids. Compared with PR, CA displayed a higher reduction in the metabolic activity of human SW480 colon adenocarcinoma cells (LC50: 10.65 mg/mL), and both extracts increased the total apoptotic cells and arrested cell cycle at G0/G1 phase. PR increased mRNA Apc gene expression, whereas both extracts reduced mRNA Kras expression. Rutin/epigallocatechin gallate displayed the highest affinity to APC and K-RAS proteins in silico. Further research is needed to experiment on other cell lines. Results suggested that CA and PR are polyphenol-rich plant sources exhibiting antiproliferative effects in vitro.

Keywords