Improvement of clinical and radiological outcomes of root repair patients with advanced articular cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The main purpose of this study was to investigate clinical and radiological outcomes of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair in knees with advanced articular cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis compared to those with minimal degenerative change. Methods Thirty‐three knees underwent MMPRT repair using an arthroscopic pullout repair tibial tunnel technique. Clinical scores including Lysholm Score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) Score were collected preoperatively and sequentially at 6 months, 12 months and mean final follow‐up of 39.4 months. Kellgren‐Lawrence (K‐L) osteoarthritis grade, Outerbridge classification of cartilage degeneration and the presence of bone marrow oedema on MRI were also evaluated. Results All clinical scores improved at final follow‐up for knees with K‐L grade ≥ 2 osteoarthritis (p < 0.001), with no significant difference compared to K‐L 0/1. Patients with Outerbridge class 3/4 cartilage degeneration also reported improvements in clinical scores, albeit lower than those with class 2 degeneration (p < 0.05). During recovery, the majority of patients reported clinical improvements by 6 months, and six patients further improved by at least 15 points in IKDC score between 6 and 12 months. Osteoarthritis progressed in 10 of 31 knees (32%), with an overall mean pre‐operative K‐L grade of 1.6 ± 0.9 compared to 2.0 ± 0.9 at final follow‐up (n.s.). No knees progressed to K‐L 4 or underwent re‐operation. Pre‐operative bone marrow oedema was present in 17 knees (52%), all of which had signal localised to the medial tibia or femur. Oedema had resolved in all but 5 knees post‐operatively (p < 0.01). Conclusion Arthroscopic repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears is associated with improved outcomes in knees with advanced cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis. Meaningful improvements in clinical outcomes can be achieved beyond 6 months, thus success of the operation is best determined at the 12‐month mark. Oedema signal significantly improved post‐operatively, however a relatively high proportion of knees had K‐L progression. Level of evidence IV – Case Series.